Home / US / The White House, in reverse, includes Dreamer legislation

The White House, in reverse, includes Dreamer legislation

  Donald Trump is depicted. | Getty Images "title =" Donald Trump is depicted. | Getty Images "/> </source></source></source></source></picture>
                " I need a bill that gives this country a huge border security, "said President Donald Trump." I have to have it. "| Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images </p>
<div class=

President's comments took House Republicans surprised, and left speaker Paul Ryan hangs.


06/15/2018 05:45 EDT

Update 5:45 pm:

A spokesman for the White House said Friday that President Donald Trump would sign a republican government house to protect Dreamers from expulsion and build a border just a few hours after the president appeared to throw cold water on the plane.

Story Continued Below

Raj Shah said that Trump's earlier statement of opposition only referred to a proposal from republican moderators and democrats. A blessing to house leaders who hope to send immigration legislation in com

Original article:

President Donald Trump on Friday said he did not mind I write a carefully designed GOP proposition that addressed Dreamer's problem, the news that surprised House Republicans and left the legislation on life support.

Ironically, the proposal reflected the product of negotiations between centrist republics and conservatives – Trump's own framework for increasing security, limiting legal immigration and protecting dreams from expulsion.

It was not only the top White House officials, including immigration chief Stephen Miller, who worked behind the scenes to whip support for the document. And the White House had drafted a political statement saying that the president should sign the bill.

But Trump heard conservative criticism of the proposal on television, according to senior republicans, and threw the proposal down.

"I'm watching them both," said Trump "Fox & Friends" in an interview Friday morning from the White House lawn. "I would not really sign the more moderate."

Hours later, the president appointed the confusion with a tweet that required provisions that the compromise bill seems to contain. "Every immigration bill must have full funding for the wall, end catch and drop, visa lottery and chain and go to merit-based immigration. Go for it!" He wrote .

In another head spinning trip, home republicans began circulating on Friday afternoon a draft management policy that said the president would sign the compromise bill.

"Cross-border and immigration reform from 2018 would support the government's goal of securing the border, closing legal loopholes, moving to a system of merit-based immigration and protecting those illegally brought to the United States as a child." Read the statement received by POLITICO. "If the bill was presented to the president, his advisor would recommend that he sign it in law."

The appearance, at least Friday afternoon, was that the president treated a potentially fatal blow to the bill. House Majority Whip Steve Scalise also threatened to withdraw his support for the package. His office told Breitbart that the Louisiana Republican, who wants to be a speaker one day, would not whip support for any immigration bill that the president opposed.

After the morning interview, GOP leaders and White House's aids encrypted to get Trump back on the message. Later Republicans predicted that Trump would not only go back with their comments but fully support the compromise bill. His comments on television, they said, left him enough angle to say he was wasting a democratic proposal that did not cover his wall or an immigration bump – not the GOP DACA bill.

But as the day was on, the final statement never came, and the conservative applauded the president's position. Some senior republicans began to wonder if they could vote on the bill at all if Trump did not openly embrace the legislation.

"He is entitled to judge the American people's opinion on this subject, we are not there yet," said Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.). Asked what more he needed in the compromise bill, Perry seemed frightened: "Enforcement! Enforcement! We can not continue to have these half measures that do not solve the problem."

To be sure, released the GOP invoice Thursday was already in front of an uphill. Democrats oppose the action saying that it is too tailored to the wishes of immigrant clothes. But now Trump has given a group of conservatives who are already careful with the compromise a powerful reason to vote "no": he simply does not like it.

The comment comes after Ryan and other members of the House's leadership group told reporters that they had described their proposition to the president and he was "excited" about it. Ryan has stressed to reporters that he has worked "hand in glove" with the administration who wrote the bill.

In fact, senior counselor Miller came to Capitol Hill earlier this week to encourage careful conservative fear of back support from base to support the plan. And GOP leaders in meetings talked about the possibility that the Trump and White House would help them whip support.

"I spoke with the president yesterday about the details of the bill and clearly Stephen Miller and others in the administration have been directly involved in the discussion we have had and they like what is in the bill," said House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R- La.) To reporters on Thursday. "The president really likes the fact that it fully finances the wall."

Instead, Trump has put GOP leaders in a corner where they must ask republicans to vote against their own president to restore a controversial proposition on the subject that shares the party most.

Therefore, Scalie's whip law decided that they had not voted on Friday as they had planned. They knew the Republicans would not say "yes" to Trump's recent comments.

Many Republicans said Friday, they searched for more information.

"We are waiting for a clarification of what it really means," said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.). "We do not know."

R Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.), who helped create the compromise bill, said he was told that Trump "will sign it."

"I think once he has a chance to melt it, he will sign it, "said Diaz-Balart, even though he refused to say who told him and warned that it should be verified with the White House. Diaz-Balart acknowledged Republicans "has a big problem" if Congress gives back a compromise package and he knows about it. "We need the president to look at it and look at it in detail … But I hope we can get its support."

Trumps remarks are a punishment against Ryan and his team as I spent hours shouting at the speaker's office trying to have an immigration bill like moderate Republicans from districts with large Latin American populations and conservatives could come back . Both sides have given the basis of the conversation: Moderators endorsed strict enforcement measures, while conservatives for the first time were open to giving citizenship to Dreamers.

In addition, the GOP plan reflected Trump's own "four pillars" proposals that include a road to citizenship, an end to the Diversity Slot Program, Family Migration Limits, and $ 25 billion for the Limit. It would also increase border security and transparency.

House Freedom Caucus, Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) Warned this scenario as recently as Thursday, claiming that nobody speaks for the president except the president himself. And the president, he said, has not weighed in.

Meadows on Friday rejected other theories that Trump did not know what he was talking about and claimed it was "incorrect" to say that Trump referred to a democratic proposition.

"Really, at the moment, we are trying to ensure that the immigration bill that passes addresses the DACA issue and secures the border," said Meadows. "These conversations will continue."

The news is a big blow to moderate republicans who forced us immigration to the forefront. Bought with Democrats threatened to take over the floor, circumvent their own party and pass legislation to protect Dreamers from expulsion – unless the Republicans could agree on their own plan to deal with the Obama era deferred action for the children's arrival program.

To resolve the intensive negotiations that led to the compromise proposal released on Thursday.

The 293 pages proposal also contains a provision that would keep the families at the US-Mexico border. The trump administration has been broken for a controversial policy separating migrant children, including children, from their parents. Despite his administration tration controls the policy, Trump has tried to blame Democrats and use it as a negotiating chip to get its frontier from progressive.

"It's the law, and that's what the Democrats gave us," said Trump. "And we are willing to change it today if they want to come in and negotiate. But they do not just want to negotiate. They are afraid of security for our country. They are afraid of a wall."

As regards the compromise bill, he added to: "I need a bill that gives this country a huge border security. I have to have it. We must have the wall. We do not have the wall, there is no bill."

It is unclear whether Trump was aware that the house bill contains tens of billions of dollars for the wall.

John Bresnahan contributed to this report. 19659052] This article was tagged in:

Source link