Home / US / The Mueller report is more than 300 pages long. We have seen 101 words

The Mueller report is more than 300 pages long. We have seen 101 words



The Ministry of Justice shall scour the Mueller report for release in some form to the congress. Editions, cuts or edits will only give rise to frustration and lead to additional conspiracy theories.

The American people are accustomed to TMI, so the confidentiality that holds Robert Mueller's public opinion report is extremely difficult to process, especially in view of the gravity of the question Mueller investigated, such as foreign currency blending, possible campaign collusion, and obstruction of justice.

Mueller invested two years and hired points by lawyers and investigators, and from now on the public has seen 74 words from his full report. It jumps to 89 if you include the simple footnote in Barr's summary and 1
01 if you count the title.

This is the words and phrases in the quote marks on the four-page summary Attorney General William Barr delivered to Congress.

The significance of the topline assessment that Mueller did not establish collusion cannot be exaggerated – and that is good news for Trump. Mueller did not recommend any accusations against the president and he did not recommend any new charges against the White House or campaigners – but obviously several Trump employees have already been convicted by Mueller's law while others are awaiting trial or are still being investigated through regular justice departments.

The special council stated the issue of obstacles to justice, but we do not know exactly who he pointed to – the congress, for example or the public – just as the lawyer chose

What we know

The quotes that have been released as part of Barr's summary leave much to the imagination.

For example, read this main note showing that Mueller did not show that Trump or his aides collaborated with Russia:

"" [T] he did not investigate that the members of the drum campaign cooperated or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. ""

The brackets there suggest a "t" case was capitalized to form a sentence, suggesting that there is a first part of the sentence. Does the first part of the sentence indicate what the investigation did? Does it say that Trump campaign officials were in contact with the Russians and benefited from Russia's actions? Does it say the Russians have taken clues from Trump's public comments?

It doesn't matter because we know that all these things are true. But it shows how easy it is to go down the rabbit hole when all we have is truth paper.

None of the quotes from Mueller's report in Barr's summary are complete sentences.

… "while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it neither excludes him either."

… "the evidence does not show that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to the Russian electoral process. ". .

Oh, to know what comes at the beginning of these sentences.

Quotes from Mueller are not the only ones that give rise to exciting questions. Here are some of Barr's words about Mueller's report, the second part of which Barr says, "deals with a number of acts by the president, most of which have been subject to public reporting as the Special Adviser examined as potentially raising the obstruction of fair concerns."

Most are different than all. What measures by the President Mueller investigated have not been subject to public reporting?

There is so much left between the known lines of what we have now learned is a more than 300-page report that Mueller delivered to the Department of Justice.

Barr has said that he is currently clearing what Mueller provided to remove classified information or information that cannot be released because it was from a large jury investigation.

Of course, Trump could theoretically only declare all classified information open to the public. Trump has said that he had no problem with the report, which he still has not seen, published.

"It's up to the Advocate General, but it wouldn't disturb me at all," he said Monday.

Earlier reports were published

If we only knew from the FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton's e-mail that she would not be prosecuted and not James Comey's assessment that she had been ruthless with confidentiality information?

What if Bill Clinton's lawyer had been able to issue a four-sided memo instead of Ken Starr issuing his report?

That's the question Monica Lewinsky used a four letter letter to eloquently muse about Twitter this week. Her life would surely have been different.

Starr's report is still easily accessible on the Internet, or even as a book, which you can buy in paperback for $ 15.73. That's 498 pages.
  Lewinsky: & # 39; If. f *** ing. only & # 39. Clinton had received the same treatment as Trump when the Starr report was completed
The only other specialty council that operated under similar DOJ guidelines as Mueller was Jack Danforth, who in 1999 investigated state claims coverage of the deadly federal government at the Branch Davidian Association near Waco, Texas, 1993. He published his findings on the Internet in its entirety, but he did so with the blessing of then-lawyer general Janet Reno. [9659031] The 9/11 Commission report was another government's work published for everyone to read, even though the edited end group – 28 pages – led to years of conspiracy theories before most were released publicly in 2016.
Not all government reports see light of day. A report by Watergate Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski was not finally released until 44 years after it was first delivered to Congress. Not that it played a role in that case, since the secret binds the Waterpost's Special Prosecutor's Office had long been public.

At least this much of Mueller's investigation has been shown in full public opinion: five people sentenced to prison, one sentenced to trial, seven people charged with guilty, 37 people and entities charged, 199 total criminal bills.


Source link