Home / Entertainment / The end of "Avengers: Infinity War" is what happens when money writes movies

The end of "Avengers: Infinity War" is what happens when money writes movies

Warning: Major spoilers ahead. Major! You have been warned.

Ten years and 19 movies in the world famous Marvel Cinematic Universe, the famous Avengers have left their respective homes and greeted the interplanetary crusaders whose stories have not yet interacted with their own. "There is an Ant-Man and a Spider-Man?" Mark Ruffalo Bruce Banner, aka Hulk, asks incredibly in one of the more relatable moments from Avengers: Infinity War, which opens this weekend to an expected $ 225 million revenue.

Lastly, all our friends ̵

1; those whose adventures have given "Iron Man", "Thor", "Galaxy Guardians", "Spider-Man: Homecoming", "Black Panther" and other different tent powders – are familiar . How special. Of course, there is no better time to kill most of them.

In addition to that, only kind is what happens at the end of "Infinity War". After more than two hours of wham-bam chaos the movie slows down to an emotional lull. The culmination of the battle Royal gives rise to the death of Black Panther, Spider-Man, Bucky Barnes, Scarlet Witch, Doctor Strange, Star Lord, Groot, Drax, Falcon, Mantis, Nick Fury and Maria Hill, all of which are dissolved in a high of dust in the hands of a purple colossus called Thanos. How and why does not mean it hardly. What matters is that the last 20 minutes are meant to be a bowel test, test the tear ducts of Marvel disciples who have been waiting for so long to see AND Avengers cooperate with the franchise rookies. Their wishes are granted and denied in the same lethal breath.

  Danai Gurira, Chadwick Boseman, Chris Evans, Scarlet Johansson and Sebastian Stan in

What matters even more is that none of this really means anything at all. You understand, Marvel Studios is a business first (owned by Disney) and a second factory factory. And since it is a company, we know how many films some players are contracting and which ones already have a bearing on development. It includes some whose characters probably passed.

Take T & # 39; Challa, for example. Hans is easily the most shocking of the "Infinity War" death, given the current cultural fervor around "Black Panther", the best film Marvel has made. To see T & # 39; Challa's broken body resolution is, in short, heartbreaking. But wait. Is not the studio "active" negotiations on a deal for Ryan Coogler to return to the "Black Panther 2" directly? (Yes.) And did not Chadwick Boseman only finish three of the five films in his Marvel contract? (Yep.) T & # 39; Challa, in other words, will rise again, in one way or another.

And how about little Peter Parker, who joined the 2016 series and graduated to lead boy last year's joking "Spider-Man: Homecoming"? Tom Holland lands the finest moment in "Infinity War", who talks with his mentor Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) that he is not ready to die. But we do not think it's hard to connect the points on this: 21-year-old Holland is about to shoot the next "Spider-Man" movie this summer, even though his web sling just goes by.

  Tom Holland in

For kicks, here's one more. Sebastian Stan, who plays the well-equipped Bucky Barnes, is obviously busy for nine marvel leaders. (Nine?! Who has time?) So far, he has appeared in six – and it's only if we include his unpaid cameos in "Ant-Man" and "Black Panther", which probably does not count towards Stan's tally . After the movie, which will join "Infinity War" when finishing the starring "Avengers" story next year, Stan will have at least two to go. What can we draw from this information? Bucky Barnes returns, like the galaxy's guardian, who slates to end his independent story with a third installment coming out 2020, according to director James Gunn. (Chris Pratt, otherwise known as "Late" Star-Lord, has already discussed "Vol. 3".)

And so on and so forth. Most of Avengers left standing at the end of "Infinity War" hail from the first phase of Marvel's big screen ambitions. Chris Evans and Mark Ruffalo's contract extends to the end, and Robert Downey Jr. has long been under a picture-by-picture arrangement that does not guarantee his presence in future devices. These guys can cedeody of the series to the probably resurrected generation superheroes in the afengers mentioned above, whose title has not been revealed to be a spoiler that probably concerns these deaths.

Or something! Again, I'm less concerned about how the great rebirth will happen than I am with the thought that we have ample reason to assume it will happen. Which takes us back to my original point: The reason Marvel machine is not about telling. It's about trade. These films cost a fortune – with a reported $ 300 million to $ 400 million budget, "Infinity War" may be the most expensive movie ever done – and has to be negotiated year in advance. It leaves just so much space for narrative mystery. When we know what signs of slipping for future payouts, death is relatively meaningless. Entertainment, the whole third act of this film is a manipulative trick. All tears throw in multiplexes this weekend? The only real point they earned was to make sure you left another 12 dollars next year to see what comes from your favorite swashbucklers.

But we already know more or less. There are no efforts.

  Chris Hemsworth and creatures expressed by Bradley Cooper and Vin Diesel in

Even the baton pass, sometimes seen in the corresponding cartoon books – a nurse called Jane Foster, the new Thor, for example – can not override the business transactions that published in this otherwise fast franchise. Sure, maybe Shuri, T & # 39; Challa's whiz-kid sister, can not afford the Black Panther suit next. But how will Boseman fulfill his contract? (Here are the fanboy theories next to the point.)

Whatever happens in the series – crossing timelines, cape-swapping plot devices, no matter – Marvel's movies must act as, yes, movies. "Avengers: Infinity War" and anything else that costs close to $ 1 billion is put on everyone and everyone who is or does not know their literary origins. But when the franchise progresses, the chronology of events goes further and further from the order in which films are released. The only thing is inane. Historically, sequels, prequels and spinoffs clearly define a single installment on a larger line of time series – but Marvel makes little effort to do that. The audience should not need a guidebook to find out what plot technical occurred first and they should not have to interrupt their disbelief by pretending that signs that are committed for future installments are dead. I do not want to hear anything about how the "Galaxy Guardian: Vol.3" might actually occur before "Infinity War", despite the fact that theaters were hit two years later.

For comparison reasons, when the Star Wars galaxy skips between periods, each movie's title will contextualise its placement in the series clearly. Trilogies are numbered by episodes, and once given the subtitle "A Star Wars Story." There is no confusion about how the split – or individual characters interfere – fit together even when the films are released in non-chronological mode. So, from an overlapping Marvel contest to the next, we could be able to assume that the following movies have a logical review. That's how continuing works, damn. Just because Marvel is a so-called "cinematographic universe" does not make it different.

To kill so many important players in "Infinity War" is a cheap reflection of Hollywood's inflated franchise infatuation. Disney knows you will be back for more next year. Hell, you can even be back for more next weekend. And as someone who just wants to see smart (and sensual) narrative, I'm tired.

Someone saves us from this capitalist disaster. Someone who is not a super hero.

Source link