Home / Science / SpaceX "Anomaly" can delay manned spaceflight

SpaceX "Anomaly" can delay manned spaceflight



<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "On Saturday, April 20, something bad happened with SpaceX's Crew Dragon spaceship, we still don't know exactly what happened. But we now know more than we did last month. "data-reactid =" 11 "> On Saturday, April 20, something bad happened to SpaceX's Crew Dragon spaceship. We still do not know exactly what happened. But in any case, we now know more than we did last month.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1

.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "eyewitness accounts & nbsp; at the time of the event referred to as "smoke" seen over the Florida coast. NASA & nbsp; and SpaceX published statements referring to an "anomaly. "News outlets & nbsp; reported an explosion. Eventually, a leaked video of the event showed SpaceX Crew Dragon spaceships on its test ground that suddenly broke out into a flame bulb." Data-reactid = "12"> Eyewitness accounts at the time of the "smoke" event seen over the Florida coast. NASA and SpaceX released statements referring to an "anomaly". News stores reported an explosion. In the end, a leaked video of the event SpaceX Crew Dragon showed spaceships on its test ground suddenly erupted into a flame bullet.

In the beginning, SpaceX and NASA were reluctant to provide much information about anomaly, smoke or especially the explosion. But in the end, the leaked video must have convinced SpaceX and NASA to tear off the bandage and confirm what many already expected: Crew Dragon blew up.

Artist's rendering of SpaceX Crew Dragon Docking with International Space Station

Image Source : SpaceX.

<h2 class = "canvas-atom canvas text Mb em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " It is difficult to argue with a video "data-response time =" 26 "> It's difficult to argue with a video

In a public statement last week, SpaceX vice president of mission assurance described Hans Koenigsmann whether Crew Dragon successfully tested its Draco actuator twice a test drive in Florida. . It was only to prepare to fire their Super Draco thrusters (which, in the event of a failure of the spacecraft rocket booster), would be used to safely drive the spacecraft and its crew away from the explosion), when it suddenly "was an anomaly and the vehicle was destroyed. "

Now Koenigsmann's statement party leadership repeated that it was" too early to confirm "what just happened. Yet here is what we know is important to investors.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "The spacecraft that blew up last month was the same ships that managed to complete an unmanned docking with the International Space Station in March . This spacecraft, which you will remember, sprayed down at sea after completing its mission – so it is possible that the April accident had something to do with wear (and sea-water) on the ship, and not a fault in the spacecraft's original design. "data-reactid =" 29 "> The spacecraft that blew up last month was the same ship that successfully completed an unmanned docking with the International Space Station in March. This spacecraft, which you will remember, sprayed down at sea after completing its mission – so it is possible that the April accident had something to do with wear (and seawater) on the ship and not a fault in the spacecraft's original design. 19659010] SpaceX planned to re-use this special spacecraft to perform a "flight abortion test" in June, and launched Crew Dragon on top of a rocket and then lit its Super Draco thrusters to show the ability to quickly drive the canister away from one ( hypothetical) exploding rocket. Successful completion of this test would have allowed the company to launch astronauts to the ISS as early as July, in a mission called Demo-2.

But because of the April anomaly, it is now likely that both the interruption test in June during flight, and by extension the launch attempt in July, must be postponed. For one thing, SpaceX will definitely build a new spacecraft now. (Several are under construction, but it still takes time.) Some experts say that the ISS mission could go in 2020 and even Koenigsmann admits that the accident was "not good news for the schedule."

<h2 class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " What that means to investors Reaktime = "32"> What it means for investors

<p class = "canvas-atom canvastxt Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" = "text "content =" Although SpaceX rival Boeing (NYSE: BA) has suffered delays and setbacks of his own & nbsp; To get its CST-100 Starliner spacecraft ready for test flights, it is still expected to launch its first unmanned Starliner on a test drive to the ISS in August. If it goes well, a manned assignment can follow as early as November. When SpaceX now potentially sees its first manned mission delayed by 2020, this seems to shift Boeing into the lead in this race. Boeing may well win bragging rights as the company that returns US astronauts to space, aboard a US spacecraft, for the first time since the commuting program was closed in 2011. "Although the SpaceX rivalry Boeing (NYSE: BA) ] have suffered delays and self-esteem to get their CST-100 Starliner spacecraft ready for test flights, but it is still expected to start their first unmanned Starliner on a test drive to the ISS in Auguste. SpaceX, which now potentially sees its first manned mission delayed by 2020, seems to move Boeing to the lead of this competition, and Boeing can very well win the roaming rights of the American astronauts returning to space on board a US spacecraft for the first time since the commuting program was closed in 2011.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type e = "text" content = "Such success (if it happens) would tend to validate NASA's decision to pay Boeing $ 4.2 billion to drive six transport missions to the ISS on-board Starliner, compared to awarding SpaceX just $ 2.6 billion for the same job . And if NASA paid a premium for reliability once, then Boeing's argument to continue charging higher prices (and earning bigger profit margins) than SpaceX in the future would be strengthened. "Data Reaction =" 38 "> Such a success it happens) would tend to validate NASA's decision to pay Boeing $ 4.2 billion to drive six transport missions to the ISS onboard Starliner, compared to allocating SpaceX only 2.6 Billions of dollars for the same work, and if NASA paid a premium for reliability once, then Boeing's argument for continuing to pay higher prices (and earning bigger profit margins) than what SpaceX does in the future would be strengthened.

Now, everyone needs Boeing successfully launch their spacecraft to the ISS in August as planned – and then do it again three months later, before SpaceX bounces back.

<p class = "canvas atom canvastxt Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm "type =" text "content =" More from The Motley Fool "data-reactid =" 40 "> More from The Motley Fool [19659018] <p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "tex t "content =" Rich Smith has no position in any of the aforementioned shares. Motley Fool has no position in any of the aforementioned shares. Motley Fool has a publishing policy . "data-reactid =" 48 "> Rich Smith has no position in any of the mentioned shares. Motley Fool has no position in any of the aforementioned shares. Motley Fool has a policy of disclosure.


Source link