Home / Entertainment / "Ivan The Terrible and his son Ivan": a victim of vandals or provocation by Russophobe? | | Art | culture

"Ivan The Terrible and his son Ivan": a victim of vandals or provocation by Russophobe? | | Art | culture



The news also touched those who last saw this work Repin, which saves the school assignment in the genre "Composition on the picture". Arisen and crumbled versions – what happened just? The trick of a drunken hooligan? Planned ideological action by a principal against "falsification of history"? Consented to the fact that Repin's image is provocative, the artist – Russophobe and some of his works, in particular, are better not to show to anyone. The most curious thing is that these people did not say anything new.

Destruction of idols?

"The impression of Repin's painting is really harmful. She has no place in the National Art Gallery! The Tretyakov Gallery should act wisely and sacrifice it in a big panopticon ̵

1; with mandatory inscription" Adults Only! "And in a separate room." No no this is not the current hysteria in social networks. These are the words of the star age, poet Maximilian Voloshin which he delivered at the lecture "On the significance of the disaster concerning Repin's painting". The case was 1913

  Igor Podporin after his arrest.
Igor Podporin after his arrest. Photo: RIA Novosti / Evgeniy Odinokov

" Abram Balashov, 29 years old, from the old believers, in Tretyakov's gallery at 10.30, a crescent-shaped cutter knife made three longitudinal cuts, from 8 to 8 , 5 verses each "- so the newspaper" Novoye Vremya "reported on the incident on January 16, 1913. The noise then rose to heaven. The extremely right-wing newspaper Zemshchina in January 1913 found a very comfortable and most important, loyal, justification for the vandal. "Balashov comes from a patriarchal Moscow family, where the old Russian views on the tsarist power were preserved. In the painting Repin, King John is depicted in the most fulfilled form. Is not it strange that the thought of a man who has become associated with the old Russian spirit shaken by the blasphemous image of the worship service? His action resembles how the Master of Christian Antiquity destroyed the idols, what kind of anguish their religious feelings. "

As a result, Balashov became after three weeks in Alekseevsky's psychiatric clinic (in the future – the famous Kashchenko) , insanely and released. "class =" sharable_picture "src =" http://static1.repo.aif.ru/1/6b/1088083/9f962eb5fbc8f3ab9d58b24441429756.jpg "width =" 100% "/>

Click to enlarge

" Death from the Fury of the Father "

Georgy Khruslov who felt guilty of not saving Repin's masterpiece, rushed under the train.

And the actual image and artist began to spike for real. Same Voloshin after having read his lecture in February, was supported by a whole series of voices claiming that the tablecloth was not only "ugly and causes hysteria." It still does not turn out to be either historical truth or common sense. Professor in Descriptive Anatomy Lancert stated that he agrees with Vandal who rushed on the image with a knife and shouted: "Blood, too much blood!" Likewise, the blood from the wound to the temple can not flow in such abundance as on the cloth's canvas. Others insisted that Ivan The Terrible did not kill their true son at all, which means the picture is thoroughly deceptive. "Repin is not a victim of Balashov, and Balashov is a victim of the Repin image!" – It was the summary of Voloshin and his followers.

But what was the same on November 16, 1581 – the day that entered the goal's full name, Repin? That day, Ivan the Terrible son still lived, even though he was very sick in fever. He only died three days later, and not in place from a blow to the temple. The discussion between father and son took place, it is a fact. But here's how it solved – a mystery. Jesuit Antony Possevino who claimed that the king struck his son with the tip of his staff in the temple, which made him die in place, arrived in Moscow only after the prince's funeral and was not a direct witness of the events. English Jerome Gorsay who had more reliable informants in court describes the events differently. During the battle, the father struck his son not in the temple but in the ear, not with the staff's tip but with a stick. As a result, the prince fell into a nervous fever, from which he died. Russian chronicles write about the causes of Tsareva's death clearly and unequivocally: "Because of his father's fury, sickness came to him, but from the same disease he died." The question is whether the king killed his son or not, not even worth it. It turns out he killed. And the image was originally called "suicide".

  The first time the painting led on January 16, 1913. Three knocks with a knife were attributed to 29-year-old believer Abram Balashov.
For the first time, the painting was seen January 16, 1913. Three hits The knife was imposed by 29-year-old believer Abram Balashov. reproduction

"Do you need to see this?"

The whole point was just to show the terror of the king's irreparable and tragedy. Igor Grabar who led the restoration of the table after the vandal attack, said: "Nobody understood Kramskoy that phenomenon, called" Ivan the Terrible. " " Ivan Kramskoy initially frightened of both blood and" shame "changed his opinion:" The unevenness of the assassination! And as it is written, God, as it is written! In the picture there is a terrible and loud expression of his father's sorrow and his high cry and in his hands he has a son, the son he killed, and he … He can not command the students, breathe heavily and feel the sorrow of his father, his horror, crying and crying, he, like a child, wants to laugh at him: "Nothing, dad, do not be afraid!" Oh my God! You must definitely see! "

Hundred years later, 2013, the picture again caused a discussion. A group of unnecessary patriotic citizens claimed that in Tretyakov's gallery there are a number of canvas stages" which contain hard on the Russian people, in the Russian state, on Russian pious tsars and queens . It is humble, scary and fake as in his plot, and in his picturesque reproduction of the painting of I. Repin "Ivan the Terrible and his son Ivan 16 November 1581". Last week, this view was strongly supported by the vandal that decided that it could not be seen.


Source link