Home / World / Pelosi announces that house will not vote now if initiation of remand investigation

Pelosi announces that house will not vote now if initiation of remand investigation

Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced after a meeting with the House Democratic caucus on Tuesday that there will be no vote – at least for now – on initiating a formal proceeding against President Trump.

"There is no requirement that we have a vote, and so for the moment we will have no vote," Pelosi said. "We are not here to call bluffs – we are here to find the truth, because to uphold the United States Constitution. This is not a game for us. This is deadly serious. "

The move was apparently a boon to moderate Democrats in swing districts, who have been reluctant to have a formal vote for the procedures as the 2020 election approaches ̵

1; even as several of them have also tried to tell liberals voters by voting behind the ongoing investigation. [19659003] A congressional assistant familiar with the House Democrats' discussions told Fox News that many House Democrats did not want to be seen as letting the White House dictate how the House behaved. Last week, the White House sent a burning letter to the House Democrats announcing that it would not cooperate with their investigation, for a number of reasons – including that, contrary to previous earlier, no formal vote had been held on whether to initiate repeal proceedings. [19659003] Pelosi ripped off the arguments: "They have no content . They cannot defend the president, so they will deal, "she said.

At a turning moment, Pelosi told reporters," All roads seem to lead to Putin with the president "- even though the Democrats began their probe because of the president's actions concerning Ukraine, not Russia.

GIULIANI WOULDN'T FOLLOW THEIR SUBPOENA IN THE SURVEY [19659003] Last month, Pelosi unilaterally held a news conference announcing that weapons procedures should not be enforced, but the rules of the House do not require any enforcement proceedings. It is still unclear whether the courts will agree that an investigation into the restitution has been initiated without such a vote. If the courts do not find a formal investigation is underway, they may limit the Democrats' evidence gathering efforts.

However, the House Speaker announced a series of recent court victories the Democrats, including an important win in DC Circuit Court over the overc the act that confirmed Congress's authority to suspend several years of Trump's financial records from his accounting firm, Mazars.

"The decisions we won last week – three of them were against the president's hateful public fee rule from coming into force," Pelosi said, referring to the administration's immigration policy. "A decision against the president's disgraceful national emergency declaration to build his wasteful border wall. A verdict in the Mazars case led by [House Oversight Committee] President [Elijah] Cummings. … so again, five wins on Friday, one today, in terms of Emoluments. "

Separately at Tuesday's press conference, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee charged Adam Schiff, D-Calif. The White House for "stonewalling" despite these decisions.

"Were it not for the fact that at least some witnesses have provided us with documents, we would not know that there is a paper record of efforts to condition this meeting, and perhaps relate military support itself, to these political investigations that Donald Trump wanted ha, "Schiff said, referring to Trump's fateful July talks with the leaders of Ukraine." These documents would have been filled up completely by the State Department. … The evidence of congressional barriers continues to increase. "

Schiff said that the Office of Administration and Budget has refused to provide evidence of whether the Trump administration provided assistance to Ukraine, due to the country conducting an investigation by Joe and Hunter Biden's business there.

"The Constitution is complete … the house will have the sole power to acquire," Schiff said later, when asked why there would be no chair meeting on a study on violence.


The White House has strongly suggested that it will take the fight for Democrats' sentiments to the Supreme Court in 1963 "[Supreme Court ]3." of the House of Representatives never tried to launch an inquiry into impeachment against the president without a majority of the House taking political responsibility for that decision by voting to approve such a dramatic constitutional step, ”the White House's letter to Pelosi and other top Democratic leaders said.

  Activists gather for impeachment of President Donald Trump at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, September 26, 2019. Speakers at House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Pledged Tuesday to launch a formal investigation into impeachment against Trump. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)

Activists gather for impeachment of President Donald Trump, at the Washington Capitol, Thursday, September 26, 2019. Speakers at House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Engaged Tuesday to launch a formal investigation into Trump. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite)

It continued: "Without waiting to see what was actually said in the conversation, a press conference was held announcing an" impeachment inquiry "based on falsehoods and misinformation about the conversation."

Despite Pelosi's assertion that there was no "Parliament's precedent that the entire House votes before proceeding with an impeachment inquiry", several previous impeachment investigations have been initiated only with one full vote of the House – including the impeachment proceeding concerning former presidents Andrew Johnson , Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. [19659003] White House officials told Fox News that the vote that initiated the procedure was a small matter, given the consequences of possibly reversing a national election.

In response to the letter, Pelosi accused Trump of "trying to make lawlessness a virtue" and added, "The American people have already heard the president's own words -" do us a favor, however. "" (That line, from a printout of Trump's talks with Ukra ines leaders, in effect referred to Trump's request for Ukraine to assist in an investigation into election disputes in 2016, and not related to Biden.)

Pelosi continued: "This letter is obviously inaccurate and is simply another illegal attempt to hide facts about the Trump administration's harsh attempts to pressure foreign powers to intervene in the 2020 election … The White House should be warned to continue efforts to hide the truth about the president's abuse of power from the American people will be considered further evidence of obstruction. Mr. President, you are not above the law. You will be held accountable. "

Shortly before Pelosi took the microphone on Tuesday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's office stressed some of the White House's other objections to the Democrats' investigation.


Separately, the letter asserted several alleged violations of the President's rights to due process. It noted that during the current weapons investigation procedures, the Democrats did not allow attorneys for the President or the State Department to be present.

Among the GOP's complaint is that the Democrats' procedures did not provide "disclosure of all evidence favorable to the president and any evidence affecting the credibility of witnesses called to testify in the investigation," according to the White House. And "the right to see all evidence, to present evidence, to call witnesses, to be present at all hearings, to cross-examine all witnesses, to raise objections to the examination of witnesses or to the state of testimony and evidence, and to respond to evidence and testimonies "have also been hindered.

The White House argued that Democrats have also not allowed Republicans in the minority to cast ballots, which is contrary to "normal, bipartisan practice in all recently-decided permits for presidential impeachment investigations."

Fox News & # 39; Chad Pergram and Mike Emanuel contributed to this report.

Source link