Home / US / Navy confirms videos did capture UFO sightings, but it calls them by another name

Navy confirms videos did capture UFO sightings, but it calls them by another name



Three videos posted online that have been described as being related to UFO sightings do indeed include footage of "unidentified aerial phenomena," a U.S. Navy spokesman confirmed.

But as for specifics, spokesman Joseph Gradisher said the Navy does not know exactly what the objects are.

"The three videos (one from 2004 and two from 2015) show incursions into our military training ranges by unidentified aerial phenomena, "Gradisher told NBC News in an emailed statement.

" The Navy characterized the observed phenomena as unidentified, "he said.

The Black Vault website last week first reported the Navy's" unidentified aerial phenomena "designation and said the three videos are commonly known as" FLIR1

, "" Gimbal "and" GoFast. "

The videos have also been posted online by the group To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science.

The video called FLIR1 shows an oblong-shaped object, which accelerates out of view from sensors. The group says that video is from 2004 and the "2004 Nimitz incident."

Gradisher did not name the videos in his emails, but said the video from the 2004 sighting is from an aircraft from the carrier USS Nimitz.

In the video called Gimbal, a crew member is heard saying "look at that thing" about an object that they said appeared to be going against the wind. One says they believed it was a drone.

The video called Go Fast, which the group says is from 2015, shows an object that appears to be over water and crews are heard asking "what the f — is that? " and "what is that, man?"

To The Stars Academy of Arts & Science says online that U.S. military videos of "unidentified aerial phenomenon" have been through the declassification review process and approved for public release.

Gradisher disputed those assertions. He said the 2004 video from the Nimitz was widely shared throughout the ship at the time and was posted online by a crew member in 2007. The online post came to the attention of Navy officials in 2009, but officials decided not to pursue the matter because of the time that had elapsed and the size of the crew at the time, which was around 5,000

The Navy "has no information" on how the other two videos were released in general circulation, Gradisher said. "These videos are copies of official Navy footage taken by Naval personnel conducting training missions in controlled military airspace, "he said.


Source link