Ted S. Warren / AP
The head rolls in the corner office.
For decades, the main reason why managers were ousted from their jobs was the company's financial results. In 2018 everything changed. Crime and ethical disturbances that arise in #MeToo are now the largest driver behind an executive who falls from the top.
According to a new study from the consulting business in PwC, it is a nation's largest audit firm.
This is the first time that the group started tracking executive turnover 19 years ago as bad behavior scandals instead of poor financial performance was the leading cause of leadership retirement among the world's 2,500 largest public corporations.
"A lot of bad actors are cleared out of corporate American," John Paul Rollert, a professor at the University of Chicago, studying leadership ethics told.
Thirty-five percent of the 89 CEOs who resigned in 2018 for reasons related to unethical behavior arising from allegations of sexual maladministration or ethical disorder linked to things such as fraud, bribery, and insider dealing, found the study.
Managers are still squeezed out due to poor financial performance, but only about 35% of the time .
And that shift, the researchers say, is meaningful.
According to the study, corporate boards are approaching allegations of enforcement offenses with a "zero tolerance", partly driven by social pressure since the rise of the # MeToo movement.
"For companies, they admit that if they do not become aggressive with this type of behavior, they will face exceptional debts in court cases," Rollert said. "And so better to deal with these problems now than to handle the multi-million dollar trial and the bad PR that accompanies it sometime along the way."
Some former CEOs say that the study is proof that more women feel that they are calling for sharing stories of alleged abuse or maladministration, and it transforms American business.
"Employees are starting to say," how can you implement a policy on us without having to be responsible for managing directors? "" says Bill George, a senior man at Harvard Business School and former Managing Director of Medtronic, who has served on the boards of Goldman Sachs and Exxon Mobil. "The CEO's behavior must be impeccable. The board is aware of this and really feels pressured about it now."
Business Committees, George said, realized that "there is a greater reputation for not acting than acting" to remove executive.
Communications companies were hardest hit and reported a turnover of about 24 percent, followed by materials and energy. The healthcare companies logged the lowest level of the CEO's departure of about 11 percent.
Results of CEOs were closed down after allegations of sexual malnutrition or irregularities in 2018. In July, Barnes & Noble's CEO was forced out. Two months later, Les Moonves, CBS's president and chief executive officer, after having been accused of a dozen women.
The year also saw the managers of the clothing company Lululemon and the Intel exit following an internal result of a violation of the company's ethical guidelines.
The movement from the top echelons of white collar jobs, Rollert predicts, will begin meeting with business executives who may not be as well-known as media executives and household brand managers. Soon, he said, the movement that forces out the best executives will go down to smaller companies, and he said he could even reach workforce.
"The first wave of #MeToo took out some of the most profiled figures," Rollert said. "What we are beginning to see in this second and third third wave is America's business that takes responsibility for itself," he said. "There are clearly many bad actors still hiding in the shadows that must be thrown out."