Home / Sports / MLB proposes to get rid of 40 minor league teams

MLB proposes to get rid of 40 minor league teams



Major League Baseball plans to submit a proposal that would reduce the number of affiliated minor league teams from 160 to 120 in 2021, which would drastically change the way the development system works.

<p class = "canvas -atom canvas-text Mb (1

.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "While proposing, & nbsp; As reported by Baseball America the stated goal is to improve the facility's quality and player salary, it seems likely to damage the ability of MLB teams to develop talent, cost thousands of players jobs and leave dozens of cities without teams that their fans have grown to love and invest in. " data-reactid = "23"> Although the proposal, reported by Baseball America, has the stated goal of improving the facility's quality and player salary, it seems likely to damage the ability of MLB teams to develop talent, cost thousands of players jobs and leave dozens of cities without teams that their fans have grown to love and invest in.

This discussion will be because the Professional Baseball Agreement between MLB and minor league teams will expire in 2020, and the two sides seem farther apart than they have been in decades. It is not clear whether MLB has fully committed to reducing its minor league system or if this is just a starting point to negotiate, but discussions prove to be tough with so much on the line.

What does MLB plan to propose? [19659004] According to Baseball Americas reports, MLB reports that a quarter of minor league stadiums have facilities that are well below the level they want. But instead of investing in better infrastructure, the league wants to remove them from Minor League Baseball completely.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Teams can currently have unlimited affiliates with such as many players as possible in their system, but according to the new proposal, the team could only have five affiliates with up to 150 minor league contracts, which is a major problem for teams like New York Yankees who currently have eight teams with 285 players. "data-reactid =" 27 "> Teams can currently have unlimited affiliates with as many players as possible in their system. But according to the new proposal, teams could only have five affiliates with up to 150 minor league contracts. It's a big problem for teams like the New York Yankees, who currently have eight teams with 285 players.

The size and composition of different leagues would change with some Triple-A teams being asked to move down to Single-A and some going the opposite. The owners would be compensated for their loss of value, but the situation would not be ideal. Even more concerning would be the end of short seasons and rookie ball, which would effectively mean that a majority of draftees would not play in the year they are selected.

These rules would help ensure that teams spend similar money and no team has an advantage because they choose to spend more money. But it's hard to see how it benefits teams in addition to lining the owners' pockets.

Why does MLB propose these changes?

<p class = "canvas atom canvas text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "MLB has faced a lot of backlash to pay their smaller teachers under the minimum wage laws & nbsp; players have become more vocal about this issue and the league is still facing a & nbsp; class action & nbsp; 2014 issue. "Data-reactid =" 31 "> MLB has faced a lot of backlash to pay its smaller teachers under the minimum wage. After lobbyists convinced Congress to release the league from federal labor laws, players have become more vocal about this issue, and the league is still facing a 2014 group action on the issue.

<p class = "canvas-atom canvas-text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = "Several reports have indicated that players are likely to see an increase in wages by & nbsp; up to 50 percent but the owners will not only give money away for free.They have looked to cut money where possible before, as illustrated by & nbsp; qualifying offer that falls in value & nbsp; for the first time and Blue Blood's priorities & nbsp; remain under the Competitiveness Balance Tax & nbsp; over trying to sign and retain good players. "Data-reactid = "32"> Several reports have indicated that players are likely to see a pay rise of up to 50 percent, but the owners will not just give away money for free. They have looked to cut money where possible in the past, which is illustrated by the qualified offer that dropped in value for the first time and Blue Blood's priorities to stay below the competitive balance tax to try to sign and retain good players.

The simplest explanation for why the owners want this change is that they want to save money, and if they get good pressure to raise players' wages during the process, it's just sauce. And that should be a disappointment for fans across the country.

A large base of baseball fans does not have easy access to a large league park or ticket prices for large ones. Losing a team after a city spent public money on a stadium would be disastrous, even though MLB plans to help ease some teams into independent ball or tree batting summer leagues. the number of teams would help MLB's product in the field. Sport is a business, but the owners should really prioritize the game itself over saving pocket change here and there.

<p class = "canvas atom canvas text Mb (1.0em) Mb (0) – sm Mt (0.8em) – sm" type = "text" content = " More from Yahoo Sports: "data-reactid =" 36 "> More from Yahoo Sports:


Source link