Home / World / MEPs take control of the Brexit process by supporting indicative amendments | Policy

MEPs take control of the Brexit process by supporting indicative amendments | Policy



MEPs have imposed a new humiliating defeat on Theresa May, who voted to take control of Parliament's timetable to allow backbenchers to hold a series of votes on alternatives to her Brexit deal.

An amendment tabled by former Tory Minister Oliver Letwin passed, with 329 votes to 302 on Monday night, as MPs expressed their exasperation on the government's failure to develop a new approach.

The Prime Minister had previously denied saying if she would follow the outcome of a "guiding vote" process.

The government issued an offensive statement after the amendment had gone and warned that it "outweighs the balance between our democratic institutions and sets a dangerous, unpredictable precedent for the future".

Three ministers resigned from the government in order to reverse the Letwin amendment: Foreign Ministry, Alistair Burt, Health Minister Steve Brine and Business Secretary Richard Harrington. A total of 29 Tory MPs rebelled to vote for the amendment.

Harrington, who has spoken in his warnings about the risk of a break in recent weeks, accused the government of "playing roulette with the life and livelihood of the vast majority of people in this country" in his letter of departure.

The amendment was established by a cross-party group – led by Letwin and Labor Hilary Benn – and gives parliamentarians a number of votes on the alternatives until May The Ministry of negotiation announced earlier that she had not yet supported to justify holding a third meaningful vote on her affair, but insisted that she could not give Parliament a "blank check" to decide what happened next.

Some Tory Eurosceptics reacted furiously. David TC Davies accused Letwin of "posing as a working prime minister" and Bill Cash noted the vote a "constitutional revolution" that the House of Commons would regret.

After gathering Brexit backers on his country's retreat of weekend checkers and consulting with Democratic Union Party Arlene Foster and supervisor Jeremy Corbyn on Monday, she noted that she could not yet gain enough support for her twice defeated affair .

EU leaders have handed the UK a Brexit delay until May 22, if maize agreement is completed this week. Without Parliament's support, she must return to Brussels before April 12 and prepare an alternative plan.

After a weekend of trickery reports on the ministers' challenges and ultimatums, the prime minister saw her unpleasant as she talked about the congregation's Monday after saying her cabinet hoped she still hoped her business could win support.

Previously criticized Letwin's amendment and warns that the process of guiding voices may give "contradictory results or no result at all" and set a precedent that would "reverse the balance between our democratic institutions".

And although no alternative was given to his business, the prime minister refused to follow the result.


Not enough parliamentary support to hold the third Brexit vote, says Theresa May – video

"No government could give a blank check to commit a result without knowing what it is. So I cannot commit the government to deliver the results of votes held by this house. But I commit myself to engage constructively with it this process, "she said.

Instead, she can insist that she had not given up hope to get her third-party agreement back, saying she would "continue to have discussions with colleagues over houses so we can vote for the week and guarantee Brexit. "

Several Brexiters, including Jacob Rees-Mogg – who participated in Sunday's checkers meeting – have announced that they can still support their business if the DUP is supported.

Downing Street also hopes the threat of what is called "slow brexit", if MPs take over the process and require a longer Brexit delay and a closer relationship with the EU, could convince more left-backers to support her.

Corbyn told the prime minister: "The government's approach to Brexit has now become a national embarrassment. Every step of the way along this process has the government refused to reach out, refused to listen and refused to find agreement that could represent the whole country, not just Her own party. "

During a loud debate in the Commons, a series of leading backbenchers condemned what many claimed was a deep political crisis.

"What on earth has happened to our pragmatism, our adhesion and our common sense?" asked veteran Conservative MP Nicholas Soames. "Like many others, I have been really concerned about the painful, difficult and incomparable position of our country."

Governance of Parliament's timetable is usually a key force for the meeting government, but MEPs have drawn up plans to enter after May rejected several times to change the course, although her agreement was rejected on two occasions.

The defense of the movement, Tory-rebel Dominic Grieve said the parliament had "been prevented from doing its usual job" by the "straitjacket" introduced by the government.

"We need to find an alternative to see that the government has entered the sand and has had to renounce the agreement." "There should be something that is not forbidden to be discussed."

May earlier had proposed her deeply divided cabinet that she hoped to hold a third meaningful vote on Tuesday.

She then spoke to Foster, hoping to secure the party's support for her affair, which she hoped would help win over Tory Brexiters. But DUP sources insisted after their "position remains unchanged".

Foster's deputy Nigel Dodds later reacted with rage in Commons when May said the suspension of Northern Ireland's congregation in Stormont was a reason why a no-agreement Brexit would be so damaging.

In his statement to MEPs, May came closer than the last few days to exclude an urgent Brexit after last week's European Council agreed on an extension of the Article 50 timetable.

She told MEPs: "If not, house agree on it, it will not happen any agreement. " May had also opened the cabinet meeting by emphasizing the risks of a lack of Brexit, among fear among senior colleagues that she could embrace the thought, rather than accepting a longer delay.

But her spokesman then claimed that she did not intend to imply that she would never make any agreement. just that MEPs could take advantage of the opportunity to avoid it.

"The point the prime minister made is that the house has voted against no contract, and will take every opportunity to prevent there being no agreement," said the spokesman.


Source link