Home / World / Iran now counts with Rand Paul and his allies to rescue Obama's disastrous nuclear trade

Iran now counts with Rand Paul and his allies to rescue Obama's disastrous nuclear trade

This week's news that Rand Paul was acting as intermediary between President Trump and Iran is evidence of a change in strategy that the country's largest sponsor of terrorism has done with former Obama officials hoping to save the former disastrous

During the Obama administration, Iran's Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, John Kerry as an enemy in negotiating an agreement that gave the fake regime hundreds of billions of dollars in money and sanctions, made them develop ballistic missiles, did nothing to addressing human rights, Iran helped to become a more damaging conventional threat, while allowing Iran a long-term slider against nuclear weapons.

To sell the deal, Kerry and President Barack Obama relied on a series of lies and rashes of critics, parroted back by various academics and thinking thoughts, and then pledging reported by favorable media. "We created an echo chamber," said Obama adviser Ben Rhodes New York Times, on the collection of so-called experts delivering administration talking to points on a modest media. "They said things that validated what we had given them to say."

Back in 201

6, Zarif's darling clause seemed safe, because everyone expected Hillary Clinton to be re-wound and keep the deal. Everything changed when Trump shocked the world in winning re-election.

Initially, the Iranian and former Obama officials resumed the echo chamber – placed stories of the catastrophic consequences of withdrawing from the business and working with European allies hoping to get sympathetic Trump officials to convince the president to preserve the deal in some ways .

Therefore, you had Kerry's meeting with Zarif several times since he left the office and performed a desperate shadow diplomacy game involving meetings with European leaders along with the basics of Trump from French Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron to adhere to the deal in exchange for false cosmetic tweaks.

Even after Trump withdrew from the deal, there was some hope among the proponents of the agreement that they could essentially wait for Trump out and keep it warm enough in the hope that the next democratic president could revive it. The trump administration has sometimes added this hope by stopping short "maximum pressures" by issuing various sanctions exceptions. However, the Trump administration has consistently removed exemptions and reduced penalties. Although some important exceptions persist, for example, in civil-nuclear cooperation, the trend is that Iran has clearly lost faith that it will be able to push Trump through the old tactics.

Over the past few months, we have seen a clear shift and evidence that Iran and its American-based allies are trying to correct libertarians and anti-interventionist law, hoping they would be more likely to influence Trump.

We saw this in the news that George Soros joined Charles Koch to create a tank tank, Quincy Institute, co-founder of Trita Parsi, who was one of the top boosters in the Iranian affair from his perch on top of the National Iranian American Council.

Although Trump would never listen to advice from Kerry or Obama's echo chamber, he listens to friends and allies who are more susceptible to Iran's message, such as Paul and Fox's Tucker Carlson – whom he reported doing when he interrupted air strikes. Iran.

Trump's eclectic foreign policy joins in his own unique way competing feelings to the right – support for a muscular America on the one hand, and an aversion to widespread elongated wars in view of Iraq's fault. Here's how you get John Bolton as a national security advisor on the one hand and areas with agreement with Paul on the other. That's how we get both bombastic moves by Kim Jong Un and handshakes with and defense of him.

Now it is one thing to argue for a potentially long and expensive war against Iran. As I pointed out at that time, Trump's explanation for why he decided against airstrikes seemed quite reasonable (although the timing and question of how far they were in attacks have become darker since I wrote it). So I actually got to be Carlson and Paul comes from being careful with another important intervention.

There is also a risk of underestimating the gravity of the threat from Iran and overestimating the serious chances of a peace agreement.

Carlson, in the wake of Trump's decision against disruption, said, "Why do you think John Bolton is so determined to overthrow the Iranian government, which seems to be no threat to the United States?" It is one thing to argue that the risk of a full-scale war is greater than the current threat from Iran, but no threat to us, at all? Iran's regime has been a leading enemy in the United States for forty years since it took over the US Embassy in Tehran and holds 52 US diplomats and hostages in hostages for over a year and has sponsored decades of attacks on Americans and our allies while its leaders are presiding chants. of "Death to America." US State Department notes in its latest report on the subject that "Iran was the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism". In just the last few months, Iran has attacked oil tankers, shot down an American drone, threatened to disrupt shipments through the Hormuz route, seized a foreign tanker and crushed its nuclear program.

But Paul goes all the way into the same trap that Kerry did by assuming he could work with Zarif to make peace.

Politico reported Wednesday that "Paul suggested that Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif should extend a new olive branch on behalf of the president, according to four US officials. Purpose: to reduce tensions between the two countries. Trump, for his part, denied that he had appointed Paul as a kind of informal envoy, although admitting he listened to and respected Paul

In any case, the mere view revealed that Paul served as an emissary with Iran, with joy among both Obama officials trying to preserve the affair, Libertarians and Paul Allies trying to strengthen their reputation.

Wendy Sherman, one of the architects of Iran's nuclear agreement, told NBC's Andrea Mitchell: "Inside the administration there is a huge blow going on. I think John Bolton or his allies leaked the fact that Rand Paul could see Foreign Minister Zarif just to set up diplomacy. I think a senator can do what a senator wants to do. "Her defense of a senator's freedom to pursue foreign policy drew cackles from those who remember the outrageous reaction of the Obama administration when 47 senators led by late Tom Cotton released an open letter to the Iranian regime specifying that an agreement not ratified by the Congress could be nixed by a future president with a stroke of a pen.

Writing as an outside contributor to Washington Examiner former Paul co-worker and co-author Jack Hunter portrayed absurdly his former boss as the most important person standing between The United States and the War with Iran At the Libertarian Reason Scott Shackford praised Paul's report as possible as a "good news for peace."

Iran's economy is struggling because of the degrading sanctions imposed by the Trump administration and they are desperate for some form of liberation, so Zarif is in New York this week, meet They are their American allies, and members of Congress, one of whom may or may not include Paul. He adds a mini-deal to get Trump to lift sanctions.

Perhaps with guidance from some of his American allies, Zarif seems to recalibrate his message. He has appealed Trump and pledged his "caution" when he abstained from airstrikes and tried to speak the language of anti-interventionist law.

"I think the conditions are tense, so we have to do much more work to avoid a situation that is lost. No one wins in a war," he told the National Interest . He later added Trump: "He really does not want to war. He is not ideologically engaged in war – others are. Therefore, I think he must follow his own agenda, not on other peoples agendas."

It fits right into the narrative run by Paul and his allies that neo-conservatives are trying to manipulate Trump in war against their better instincts.

Zarif is a smart diplomat, whose radical Iranian regime has been smart to set as a public face to the West, as they persecute their anti-American terrorist agenda. This is the standard procedure for Iran – escalating tensions and then trying to extract concessions in exchange for backing up.

Zarif was able to force Kerry into a sweet affair and now he clearly indicates that he has a small mark in Rand Paul. The function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) {if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () {n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply (n, argument): n.queue.push (argument)} if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.push = n; n.loaded = 0; n.version = & # 39; 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async = 0 !;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window,
document, & # 39; script & # 39; // connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq (& # 39; init & # 39 ;, & # 39; 224132531296438 & # 39;);
fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, & # 39; PageView & # 39;);

(function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; to (d.getElementById (id)) {return;} js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs); } (document, "script", "facebook-jssdk"));
Source link