Home / Sports / How to Maple Leafs Shuffle Power-Play Devices

How to Maple Leafs Shuffle Power-Play Devices

During the first two months of the season, the most dangerous offensive force in the NHL Toronto Maple Leaf was the best power-play unit. Exceeding a very ineffective second group, ranked Maple Leaf's third in the NHL in 29-percent power-play conversion, consisted only of Colorado Avalanche and Winnipeg Jets.

But since December 4, Leaf's power play has been definitely cold, and although there have been a few games in the stretch where it has managed to break through, the team has overall succeeded with the 25th best power-play conversion rate of 11.4 percent.

It is a stretch of 16 games for Toronto, but only 76 minutes and six seconds of playing time, so we're dealing with small samples here. Even so, 1

6 matches almost 20 percent of an NHL season, so it's no surprise that Mike Babcock, whose job is to win games in the short term, has decided to split the vaunted top unit to look for some more balance , and maybe flash in a bottle.

While Leaf's superstition, which included all three of the team's three centers, scored at a dry pace, the risk of having to use a tired twist just after the power play ended due to the greatness played almost two minutes seemed worth it. Now, with the power game no longer scoring, the resolution must be expected.

The question I have is, have opponents who have now had time to play the plan for all that talent stops Toronto's power game, or did Leafs just suffer an accident in the way?

Splitting Maple Leaf's offensive issue on December 4, we can see that Toronto gets fewer points on the chances of all kinds and beats his passports to the castle less often, while focusing more on East-West passes. As a rule, I am a fan of east-west puck movement and the type of passes that Mitch Marner does specifically on the power game through the middle of the ice creates great points that force goaltenders to move and save transitions.

However, a problem with East-West passes how many of those on the power game tend to lie between the two points, which is an artifact of old-fashioned power games that rely on an hour from the point – something that is not so successful today .

Since December 4, 80.5 of the leaves of the 129.4 East West per 60 go between the points, which means that the power game has been forced up more often than

Now, before Leaf's fans start to panic that the club's power play is shut down and all the talent that wastes, let's put these numbers in some context here:

] • Leaf's high-risk ranking on the power game since December 4: first
• Online shot from the track: others
• Shooting attempts from the track (scoring chances): first
• Fits into the track: first
• East-West passes under the top of the circles: 11th.

Sounds like a power play that is doomed to fail for the rest of the season for you?

It is true that Leaf's management in these categories compared to the first two months of the season is much smaller. Until December 4, their 32 high-risk chances per 60 minutes were almost 12 more than the next best team in Colorado 20.6, and their 52.7 online scores per 60 dwarfed the second most dangerous shooter team in Winnipeg, setting up 38.1 points chances online during the same period.

So is Leaf's power play still as a ground-breaking elite as it was? No, but it's still probably the most dangerous man's advantage in the league, it's just a downturn when it comes to finishing.

Although the underlying figures remain strong, I don't think Mike Babcock is necessarily wrong at breaking up the top unit. In fact, the leaves have sufficiently high offensive players to run two strong units and keep their players more ready for the transition to even strength if the egos can be handled.

Keep in mind how Maple Leafs are driving their power play, we can see to evenly strengthen numbers for individuals to see who should release where to begin with the greatness.

Of course, the first unit of Leafs ice on every power game should be built around Mitch Marner. For the third straight season, Marner is among the leading leaders in making chances per minute on the power game, and his chemistry with Tavares is undeniable. There is no need to change the roles any of the players have played so far, so Marner is the quarterback on the right-hand half-wall, and Tavares is the front man.

Morgan Rielly has constantly demonstrated his ability to support power games from the midpoint, so he should stick to the upper unit.

Normally, I would say that Nazem Kadri should keep his place as the bumper in the middle of the ice, but we try to spread talent a little, and I think that Marner has a time-lapse option in the high slot, so he hits right-handed Kasperi Kapanen It makes sense, especially when he establishes himself as a goalie this season.

On the left half wall, the options start to thin out a little, but Patrick Marleau can be a decent alternative there to get money on resumed chances.

The other unit is apparently built around Auston Matthews, which is much different from Mitch Marner, but I think it can be dynamic in the same place. Matthew's torment and unbelievable shots make him a threat from the place that reminds me of Alex Kovalev, forcing teams to back and give him space.

Kadri fills his usual place as a bumper on this unit and without Matthews on the left will get more shooting opportunities while beating William Nylander on the left half wall, Kadri gives the opportunity to receive a walk from a high-end playmaker.

Jake Gardiner fills the supporting role from the center point, which just leaves a place to fill – the front of the network. For that I would look to Leaf's third-ranked player in high-chances per minute at 5-vs-5 this season, Andreas Johnson.

It is unlikely that either of these two units will be as strong as the top unit was for the magazine at the beginning of the season, but both have the potential to be among the league's best, and each player is torn in one place (f, b, e , v, n, t, s) {if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function ()
{N.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply (n, argument): n.queue.push (argument)}
If (! F._fbq) f._fbq = n;
n.push = n; n.loaded = 0; n.version = & # 39; 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async = 0 !;
t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window,
document, & # 39 ;, & # 39; // connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js');
fbq (& # 39; init & # 39 ;, & # 39; 518786884949926 & # 39;);
fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, & # 39; PageView & # 39;);
Source link