Large letters in food packaging often tell half of the truth (and that's why they are big lies), which can lead to unhealthy product choices. The party does not save the fine prints by analytically recording the ingredients in each product, precisely because it is very … good. The European Federation of Consumer Organizations (BEUC), through the security measures, highlights safety deficiencies in European food labeling regulations and calls on the European Commission not to do anything
How many times have we not seen a food package that broadly advertises the content "rich in calcium "," boosts the immune system "," is rich in fiber "or in vitamin t? These claims are often not groundless or false, but in some cases they say half of the truth. At the same time, the same product can be too "rich" in sugars, fats and salt, so consumption (especially in large quantities) is unhealthy. The increased presence of sugars or fats is written in scripts, but often the behavior of the nutrition claim emphasized on the packaging wins the battle for attention. "
" "A mom in the supermarket cannot radiograph the fine print when the box she says she has a lot of calcium and good for her child," says Nicos Tseberlidis, chair of the Center for Consumer Protection (KEPKA), in "K". "The European Commission should have set limits for sugar, fatty and particularly saturated salt for all foods that want to show nutrition claims. Companies submit applications with more modest claims, and when they get approval they are exaggerated in advertising."
European Federation of Consumers Calls on the European Commission to increase food profiles for over ten years as it could handle the wise claims that show unhealthy foods as healthy. BEUC highlights the problem of obesity in Europe. "When half of the Europeans are overweight, just healthy foods deserve to say they are fine," said BEUC director Monsieur Goyens recently. The union regrets that the European Union has adopted legislation to create "diet profiles" in 2006 with a timetable for publication in 2009. "Ten years later, we see no" lifestyles. "Instead, the Commission has begun an examination of whether the" nutrient profiles "that have never been implemented are needed now, says BEUC.
by consumer organizations, Vaios Karathanos, professor at the Department of Dietetics and Nutrition at Harokopio University. "In any case, consumers should be trained to read the fines . My experience says that companies do not dare change their composition, the fines are large and EFET's controls are effective, says Karathan in "K". "Companies do not lie, but they do not tell the whole truth. For example, they cannot mention emulsifying agents or not highlighting allergenic substances they need," he added. Karathan emphasizes that the process of getting a food for nutrition claim is very strict, while he says he "has confidence in EFET, which has first-class staff" despite the major shortcomings of its composition.
According to Report from the Unified Food Control Body for 201
A total of 164 attacks of unsafe food were made in 2018 and 72 tonnes of products were collected, while four companies were suspended. In 2018, a total of 1,138 citizens submitted complaints with EFET (of which 58.1% were named). Only 10.8% of the complaints were made on a sample, while 12.1% were related to the label presentation