Home / Technology / Google's loss in the right to forget the case for introducing a precedent

Google's loss in the right to forget the case for introducing a precedent



Sometimes it's not a complete victory to win a case, especially if the case was not fired directly. At least, it may impose a legal precedent on several of the same cases. Of course, there is a chance that it will happen even more when you lose. That's the situation Google will find soon in Europe after losing what is considered a landmark "Right to Forget" case in Britain.

In 2014, the ECJ ruled that search engines resembled Google, may be asked to remove irrelevant and outdated data from search results. Since then, Google has been flooded with requests to remove millions of links to search results, often by embarrasing, compromise or legal facts that people would prefer to keep private. Search engines are given the opportunity to deny such requests for reasons of public interest, and often deny them.

As a result, two applicants, identified as NT1

and NT2, take their case to the UK Supreme Court. NT1 was sentenced for conspiracy to report incorrectly in the late 1990s, earning four years in prison. NT2 sentenced more recently to conspiracy to intercept communications and spent only six months in jail. Both want the court to force Google to remove links related to their beliefs, but only one got their wish.

Judge Justic Warby ruled for NT2 and declared that his crimes were not made in relation to customers or investors and has shown regret since he was released. The referee believes there is less risk that NT2 will be a repeat violation. NT1, on the other hand, is quite the opposite and continues to mislead the public, the judge said.

However, the court still appealed to NT1 and noted that there are likely to be more cases of this kind, especially in view of NT2's victory. Carter-Ruck, who works for both NT1 and NT2, also said that it would not only lead to Google, but also the UK information commissioner's office to review and improve its handling requests for notification requests.

VIA: The Guardian


Source link