Home / World / From NATO, a new proof that Belgium and Germany are pathetic allies

From NATO, a new proof that Belgium and Germany are pathetic allies

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg released his 2018 report on the Alliance on Thursday. It provides new evidence that Belgium and Germany remain exceptionally pathetic NATO allies. This is important for NATO to be an alliance on the large part of the world's security, prosperity and the world's freedom.

Unfortunately, the actions of Belgium and the Germans continue to betray their words. At the United Nations 2014 Summit in the UK, all federal states formally agreed to move towards spending at least 2 percent of GDP on defense and at least 20 percent of their defense budgets on equipment purchases. What has Belgium and Germany done over the next few years? Not much.

Think of NATO's new data. First of all, take a look at each country's defense expenditure as a percentage of GDP (for the context, the US spent at least 3.34 percent of GDP on defense between 201


In 2014, Belgium spent 0.98 percent of GDP on defense and Germany spent 1.18 percent. The following years:

2015: Belgium: 0.92, Germany: 1.18
2016: Belgium: 0.92, Germany: 1.19
2017: Belgium: 0.91, Germany: 1 , 23
2018: Belgium: 0.93, Germany: 1.23

These figures prove the lie of both governments in their 2014 agreement. The statistics show that no nation cared about investing in NATO's common defense.

Now let's look at the equipment expenses as a percentage of each nation's total defense costs. The equipment goal is crucial for equipment to offer instrumental measures for allied strategy against an enemy. Let's take us in the US here for an annual context.

In 2014, Belgium spent 3.52 percent of its total defense budget on equipment. Germany spent 12.94 percent, and the United States spent 25.97 percent. The following years:

2015: Belgium: 3.44, Germany: 11.93, USA: 25.41
2016: Belgium: 4.66, Germany: 12.21, USA: 25.05
2017: Belgium: 6.41, Germany: 13.75, USA: 25.73
2018: Belgium: 9.80, Germany: 14.13, USA: 25.27

Look at these differences. While Belgium gets some credit to increase spending to almost 10 percent, it is still far from what it should have done. And Germany? Your numbers testify to a broken military, the best parts of which it is reluctant to even distribute. Of course there is a follow-up question here. If these nations do not even meet their 20 percent equipment goals, where are they spending the rest of their defense budgets?

The answer: to staff. In 2018, Belgium used an insane 72.06 percent of its defense budget on staff, and Germany spent 46.97 percent. That's what defense spending looks like. Defense spending for jobs, rather than for defense. The equipment targets exist exactly to prevent this.

Belgium is worth hosting NATO headquarters. It has benefited from US intelligence which has saved hundreds of citizens' lives. Then there is Chancellor Angela "Nord Stream II" Merkel in Germany. Merkel, which columnist Jennifer Rubin calls the leader of the free world, has proved to be anything but. And in his neglect of allies, Merkel has betrayed other European NATO powers such as Britain and France.

Stoltenberg recently told Washington Examiner that he should run Germany to do more on defense, but the evidence suggests that Merkel does not listen. The leader of Europe's largest economy is pleased with the current status quo, where the United States accounts for 50.1 percent of total NATO GDP and 70 percent of total NATO defense spending.

Merkel is freeloader-chief. And sad, generous German expenses for foreign aid are not counted with Western security for the simple reason that helper cars will not stop Russian thoughts.

  Screen Shot 2019-03-14 at 3.18.53 (2) .png

(Screenshot / Nato)

Trump should stand up for NATO without an equal position, while continuing to invest in a military that can cope with any threat. But NATO report also gives Trump another lesson. It shows that the President's rage on states like Germany and Belgium is both necessary and morally necessary. The next time Trump speaks to NATO, he should directly punish the names of the leaders who dare laugh, such as Merkel and Belgium's Charles Michel. He would do well to say that NATO is moving to London or Paris and that Germany loses its US military bases to Poland.

Let's see if they laugh then.

Source link