Home / World / Democrats celebrate New Zealand pistol ban revealing leftist authoritarian impulses

Democrats celebrate New Zealand pistol ban revealing leftist authoritarian impulses

New Zealand's decision to swiftly replace weapons in the wake of Christchurch's shooting has drawn praise from the Democrats – in the process, the left's chilling reveals authoritarian impulses.

On Thursday, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced that the nation would immediately ban the sale of a broadly defined class of semi-automatic weapons and then offer a brief "amnesty" to those who legally bought their weapons to hand them over to the police at a price that determined by the government.

On the surface, this has no bearing on the United States, where fortunately our arms rights are incorporated into the Constitution and confirmed by the Supreme Court. But it has been quite chilling to witness how many American liberals and prominent democrats encouraged the governments of New Zealand. Even as liberals often insist that no one talks about removing weapons, many applauding the government's decision to quickly seize weapons from statutory citizens without any debate or legal argument.

Leading 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, who actually has a reputation as one of the democrats who is less hostile to gun ownership, tweeted: "This is what real action to stop the violence looks like. We must follow New Zealand's leadership, take on NRA and ban sales and Distribution of Abuse Weapons in the United States. "

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is celebrated by tweeting, "This is what leadership looks like."

It is a totally frightening way of thinking. As President, Barack Obama argued for gun control in the wake of various mass shootings. He was no less than a leader than Ardern; he just stymied because there was not enough support in the congress and the constitution sets limits on what is possible in the US. Since we have a system of controls and balances, it is really difficult to do things quickly in the American system. And that's a good thing.

We just went through a debate in the US where Democrats beat President Trump to take the step of explaining a national emergency after Congress blocked funding for its border. "Donald Trump may not like it, but we are not an authoritarian country," Sanders says. "We have a constitution and separation of powers. There is no" national emergency "and Trump cannot build his wall without the congressional approval."

I strongly criticized Trump's declaration and believe that Congress should act to force the emergency power law. But it is also worth noting that Trump's action was contested by Congress and will have to survive many legal challenges, which will at least delay it substantially, unless ultimately hinder his ability to build a wall. If Trump had the ability to act in a way that corresponded to what was just going on in New Zealand, they would already build the wall.

window.fbAsyncInit = function () { FB.init ({

AppId: & # 39; 190451957673826 & # 39 ;,

xfbml: true, version: & # 39; v2.9 & # 39; }); };

(function (d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; to (d.getElementById (id)) {return;} js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs); } (document, "script", "facebook-jssdk")); The function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) {if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply (n, argument): n.queue.push (argument)} if (! f._fbq) f._fbq = n; n.push = n; n.loaded = 0; n.version = & # 39; 2.0 & # 39 ;; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async = 0 !; t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (e) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window, document, & # 39 ;, & # 39; // connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq (& # 39; init & # 39 ;, & # 39; 224132531296438 & # 39;); fbq (& # 39; track & # 39 ;, & # 39; PageView & # 39;);
Source link