Home / US / Chief Justice John Roberts is showing his cards

Chief Justice John Roberts is showing his cards



It was a bad sum for a week in June, the last month of the annual session. In addition, two of the three were unanimous and no one made big headlines.

But the term will not end this way. And much of the importance of this important session lies on Robert's shoulders.

This is the first time in Robert's 14 years as top justice that he is likely to be the deciding vote on several final tense cases – a total of 24 in the next two weeks. Roberts landed in the court's ideological center last year when justice Anthony Kennedy retired after three decades. And since Roberts has long been to the right of centrist conservative Kennedy, the court is based on making a sharp conservative turn.

On Friday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court's senior liberal, declared a set of 5-4 judgments to come and said that Kennedy's retirement would be "of the greatest consequence" for ongoing cases.

When near-court observers have predicted that for nearly a year, such a prediction is of a different magnitude coming from a justice that has witnessed the first-hand court's private votes in its closed conference room. Ginsburg knows where the majority are heading.

Two of the politically charged cases awaiting dissolution, testing 2020 census-specific issues and partisan gerrymanders may lead to decisions that favor the interests of the Republican parties and reinforce the character of the partisan of a court consisting of five GOP appointed and four democratic.

Being a signal Roberts ̵

1; always insisting that the court is a neutral actor – does not want to send, despite previous sentiments that would put him on the Republican side in both.

  The Supreme Court may have already decided the census case. Will the new revelations do?

"People need to know we're not doing politics," he said in a February appearance at Belmont University in Nashville. "They need to know that we are doing something different, that we apply the law."

Conflicts over such interpretations of the law, and the nation's capital driving environment, are undoubtedly on long-standing disagreements behind the scenes.

Among the most anticipated cases are those who test whether the Trump administration can validly add citizenship problems to the 2020 census; whether judges may limit partisan gerrymanders who make it almost impossible to exclude the controlling party in a state; and whether a 40-foot cross, a memorial of the World War called the Peace Cross, can remain on public land in Maryland.

Predictions at this stage may be ugly but based on oral arguments and other signs from the justice, the answer to all three questions may be yes. It is certain that the nation is on its way to more 5-4 decisions. It is also likely that the 64-year-old chief who is concerned about the chief's place in these fleeting times will try to neutralize political appearance.

In June 2018, when Roberts wrote five justice The decision to uphold President Donald Trump's travel ban on citizens of certain majority Muslim countries, he postponed the execution and insisted (over a departure from the four liberals): "This is an act which could have been taken by another president. " [19659015] RELATED: Roberts treats Trump as a regular president. Sotomayor says no way.

Census Decisions

June is always difficult as the justice ends the views in the most difficult cases and determines which ongoing appeals should be planned for arguments in the coming term, beginning in October.

  John Roberts has voted for abortion restrictions. Will he turn around Roe v. Wade?

Since these April arguments, US Civil Liberties Union and others who agreed to the legal challenge against the Trump administration that they had found new evidence that the trade department was trying to help the Republicans. They cited a recently published 2015 study written by dr. Thomas Hofeller, a Republican redistricting expert, said the use of only the citizens' voting age population for district purposes would be "beneficial to Republicans and non-Hispanic whites".

The Supreme Court has not responded to the revelation, which was passed on to the justice in a letter. But Roberts had clearly under oral argument that he believed the judges would consider material that was not part of the previous Dutch court's record in the case.

In public appearances, Roberts has played his part at the root of the nation's highest court. "There have been 17 judges, and I would be very surprised if people here could name them," he told Belmont University. "My point is that you are not guaranteed to play an important role in your country's history, and it is not necessarily a bad thing if you do not."

But now he is not only in the middle chair, chairman. He is also placed to determine the outcome of the cases. It is not yet known how he will balance his institutional and ideological interests.

  Inner story of how John Roberts negotiated to save Obamacare

The Supreme Court's trials can be insecure, and Monday, nothing was revealed in Robert's or his colleagues' courtroom about what is expected between June 17 (when the nine are scheduled to return to the bench) and the end of the month.

In his New York speech last Friday, Ginsburg considered that the court would release a series of disputed decisions, and that the absence of Kennedy's stabilizing influence would be consequently.

Ginsburg pointed to comparisons between the census and the latter's "travel bid" case.

She referred to the notion that Robert's majority had shown the Trump administration in the latter and ended his discussion with the former with this observation: The Challengers "in the Census case have argued that a Ginsburg Government warns the court may be sharply divided into final cases" data -src-mini = "// cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-small-169.jpg" data-src-xsmall = "// cdn .cnn.com / cnnnext / dam / assets / 181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-medium-plus-169.jpg "data-src-small =" http://cdn.cnn.com/ cnnnext / dam / assets / 181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-large-169.jpg "data-src-medium =" // cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181130143903-01 -ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-exlarge-169.jpg "data-src-large =" // cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file- 1130-super-169.jpg "data-src-full16x9 =" // cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-full-169.jpg "data -s rc-mini1x1 = "// cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/181130143903-01-ruth-bader-ginsburg-file-1130-small-11.jpg" data-demand-load = "not-loaded" data-eq-pts = "mini: 0, xsmall: 221, small: 308, medium: 461, large: 781" src = "data: image / gif; base64, R0lGODlhEAAJAJEAAAAAAA /////// wAAACH5BAEAAAIALAAAAAAQAAkAAAIKlI + py + 0Po5yUFQA7 "/>

What is read in Ginsburg's speech? Whether she's imagined it, Ginsburg has the reputation of releasing hit tips outside the courtroom.

In mid-June 2012, she said in a speech that "the term has been more than usual taxation". It was just before a narrow majority of justice, with Roberts deciding the decisive vote, maintained the affordable law of care based on the surprising justification of the Congress's fiscal power.


Source link