BRASÍLIA – The Supreme Court (STF) resumed Wednesday afternoon 12, the judgment about the possibility of doing homeschooling in Brazil, that is, students can be trained at home without having to go to school. The analysis of the theme began last week with the vote of rapporteur Luís Roberto Barroso, for which homeschooling is legal and compatible with the Constitution. Because the matter has a general repercussion, the ministers decide that all the judges of the country should follow.
The judgment on Wednesday was raised with the position of Minister Alexandre de Morae. In his vote, Barroso emphasized that the discussion does not concern whether home education is better or worse, but considering the choice of parents who choose something other than the traditional model.
"No father or mother makes this choice, which is much more laborious because of laziness or caprice," the minister said, for which federal constitution did not establish a single educational standard.
Barroso also emphasized that home teaching practice has increased worldwide, such as the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.
On the other hand, the minister set parameters for the parents' ability to raise their children at home. According to the rapporteur's vote, parents should inform the municipal education departments about the possibility of homeschooling. Children should undergo periodic assessments. The data can be shared with other authorities, eg. prosecutors and if the lack of academic education is proven, the parents will be informed and, if there are no improvements in the income of the child or youth, competent public bodies may decide to enroll in normal establishments
AGAINST. In plenary demonstrations last week, the Secretary General of the Union, Mrs Grace Mendonça and Vice-Advocate Luciano Maia resisted the possibility of homeschooling.
"The Mission From"
For the deputy PGR homeschooling is not a modernity but a one-size-fits-all method to the school. back to the past, to what was applied at the beginning of the century when it was still difficult for the state to organize and identify that it was a duty to educate everyone. "
The case. The resource analyzed by the ministers arrived at STF 201