A federal appeal court in Richmond, Virginia, sent a challenge to the addition of a citizenship issue to the census back to the sub-court to determine whether the Trump administration acted discriminatoryly when it decided to ask for citizenship.  The divided third-panel panel of the 4th th US Circuit Court of Appeals stated in an order on Tuesday that it was the custody case back to the federal district court in Maryland for further proceedings on equivalent claims. [1
Posten showed Hofeller talked to a trade department transition official about adding the citizenship problem to the census. E-mails found at Hofeller's units also showed that the inclusion of the citizenship problem would give Republicans and non-Spanish witnesses a political advantage.
In an application on Monday, Hazel wrote the evidence presented by the challengers "potentially linking the dots between a discriminatory purpose – the dilution of Hispanic's political power – and the decisions of the secretaries" and said there was sufficient evidence to resume the case. 19659003] "When more puzzle pieces are placed on the carpet, a disturbing picture of the decision-makers' motives takes place," he said.
The order from the Richmond-based court adds another wrinkle to the ongoing dispute over the Trump administration's decision to add the citizenship issue to
Three judges – including the judge in Maryland – blocked the trade department from asking for citizenship at the census, and the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the dispute in April.
A High Court ruling on whether the Trump administration could include citizenship The question of the census is expected as early as Wednesday The case considered the challengers that the Trump administration violated the administrative regulations and the constitution when they decided to ask for citizenship on the census.
But the discovery of evidence from Hofeller has thrown an 11-hour twist into the disputes. While the Trump administration said it was decided to add the citizenship problem to the census to ensure better enforcement of the voting law, states, major cities and groups challenging the move confirm the results underlying those claims.
The Immigrant Rights Groups reported the New York court, which first heard the dispute, of the results of the month, but Judge Jesse Furman explained that he would wait for the Supreme Court to rule.
Lawyers of the US Civil Liberties Union, representing the organizations, asked the Supreme Court a month to consider postponing their verdict in the light of the new evidence.
But the Ministry of Justice has pushed back the results and inquiries from the challengers. In a letter to the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the law firm Noel Francisco, based on Hofeller's information, demanded that the Trump administration dealt with discriminatory intentions of a "speculative conspiracy theory not supported by the evidence and legally irrelevant".