With major new product launches, Apple usually searches early-page review units with an embargo that guarantees that all reviews land at the same time.
With the 2018 MacBook Pro update, it's more an iterative update, the company has not done this time so we'll see a drop of reviews.
Photographer Austin Mann found that the speed difference over his 2013 machine was a good idea for the new machine. was dramatic, as you expect, but also over the maximized 2016 model it was seriously impressive.
The test was easy: Convert a 4K Mavic Pro video to 1080p H.265 (HEVC) with QuickTime Player File> Export as> 1080p> Check "Use HEVC").
I have three different MacBook professionals, all on MacOS 10.13.6, all running QuickTime 10.4, all with the original file on the internal drive and exporting to the internal drive. Here is the result:
My daily MBP until I discovered these results: 2.3 GHz i7 MacBook Pro (15 ", Late 2013, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD) = 1980 seconds (33 minutes)
Line 2016 MBP : 2.9 GHz i7 MacBook Pro (15GB, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD) = 99 seconds
This state of the art 2018 MBP: 2.9GHz i9 MacBook Pro (15GB, 32GB RAM, 4TB SSD) = 24 seconds
For a professional photographer, he says that even the usual 4TB SSD cost is money good.
Laptop Power praised the "flaming" performance but was not impressed by graphics or battery life.
This thing shouts fast. We're talking the fastest SSD ever in a laptop, plus some other comparison points that give some – but not all – Windows machines to shame […]
It just took the system 2 seconds to duplicate 4.97GB of files, which means 2,519 megabytes per second. Incredibly, we found another view tetic benchmark to test the SSD name BlackMagic Disk Speed Test. The result? An average write speed of 2,682 MBps […]
The only area where the MacBook Pro is falling a bit flat is graphics. On the OpenGL part of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, which measures graphics performance, the 2018 MacBook Pro provided 13-inch 41.1 frames per second. XPS 13 did 49.3 fps on the same test […]
The MacBook Pro 13 inch did not work well on our web browsing battery test. Maybe it's the Core i7 CPU in our configuration or the dedicated T2 chip that always listens to Hey Siri or Touch Bar (or all of the above), but we saw an impressive driving time of just 7 hours and 32 minutes. It is well below the average premium laptop at 8:28.
Mark Spoonauer also felt that Apple's design was somewhat behind some Windows notebooks, such as Dell XPS 13.
NASA Engineer Craig Hunter
MacObserver ] said that the best review it has Set is one of Craig Hunter, NASA space technician and developer of the Theodolite IOS app. He put it through a series of fluid dynamics calculators to benchmark performance and was impressed.
For a final CPU benchmark, I would like to look at LINPACK, which solves a tight system of linear equations through LU decomposition with partial twisting. This benchmark uses Intel's Math Kernel Library (MKL) code and resolves a system of 15,000 equations. Here, the 2018 MacBook Pro runs with the two iMac Pro models up to about 5 kernels before they fall off, which is quite impressive. The new 6-core 260GFLOPS MacBook Pro code is 60% faster than the old 2016 model was 4 kernels.
He said that 32GB RAM was very welcome and the True Tone screen is a 19659012] MacWorld
MacWorld thinks it's about speed, with maximum RAM another advantage.
MacWorld I often say in laptop reviews that if you bought last year's model, you probably will not find results that are compelling enough to upgrade. But this year, it is different for anyone using multi-core apps. Six processing cores are better than four, and the performance boost is deeply satisfactory for proapp users. You will find that the investment quickly pays for itself […]
In another welcome upgrade, Apple made the switch from DDR3 RAM into previous MacBook Pros to DDR4 RAM in the 2018 models […] The maximum amount you may have installed is now 32GB, twice the size of the previous 15-inch MacBook Pro. This is a change that users have wanted for a while.
But if your use will not take advantage of the speed increase or additional RAM, says Roman Loyola, then there is probably some reason to upgrade from either the 2016 or 2017 models.
In terms of performance, Apple does not eat here. Running Geekbench 4 (a popular PC benchmark), I received an impressive 5540 on single core and 23345 with multi-core test. Geekbench got similar – if slightly lower – resulting in its own high end tests. Here is founder John Poole about the results:
For the 15-inch models, single core performance is 12-15% and the performance in multiple cores is 39-46%. Since the underlying processor architecture has not changed significantly between models 2017 and 2018, performance increases are due to higher turbo boost rates, more kernels, and DDR4 memory.
2018 MacBook Pro is the most comprehensive upgrade (at least in terms of performance) since the introduction of quad-core processors in the 2011 MacBook Pro.
Overall, it represents a significant upgrade from last year's model. Individual performance varies depending on many different subjects, but there is no doubt that these are powerful machines.
Brian Heater says that for those who do not need the power, the new keyboard and True Tone screen are nice to have, but do not justify an upgrade from previous models.
In addition to the full reviews, there were some early hands-on bits. These are useful because they do not have time to test performance, they focus on other differences.
Engadget s Dana Wollman said that the difference in True Tone was hard to ignore. "
If you look at the disc, I probably said good things about the MacBook Pros screen before True Tone was introduced (you did), but when you set the setting on and off, the difference is hard to ignore. I imagine this function will be good for everyday use, but people like picnics who are picky about color will probably want to disable it while working.
She also welcomed Hey Siri but had to disable it on his phone to make sure that Mac answered.
Verge focused on a slightly quieter (and almost certainly more reliable) keyboard and True Tone display.
Back to this keyboard. It's not quiet but it have a less metallic, clacky sound to it. It's a subtle difference and definitely not a reason to buy this machine (the modern Intel processors are the main feature), but it's there […]  True Tone also works here as on iPad Pro – at least when watching the screen. The color temperature changes and white is much easier on the eyes.
Dieter Bohn also notes that the Touch Bar also adjusts its color temperature, which is a very Apple-like detail, but he says it's very subtle.
I have no reason to upgrade my own 2016 machine – my plan is to stick to it for a few more years – but my colleague Jeff Benjamin sets the 2018 model through his steps as I write,